Risk factors for postoperative bleeding and early death in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: A multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Comprehensive reports on the risk factors for bleeding and early death after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) are limited. In this multicenter study, we retrospectively investigated the risk factors for bleeding and early death after PEG. METHODS: Patients (n = 1234) who underwent PEG between 2015 and 2020 at Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University and its affiliated hospitals (11 institutions in total) were evaluated for postoperative bleeding and early death (within 60 days) after PEG according to patient characteristics, construction method, medical history, medications, preoperative hematological findings, and perioperative adverse events. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of bleeding and early death after PEG. RESULTS: The risk factors for bleeding after PEG were PEG tube insertion using the modified introducer method (odds ratio [OR], 4.37; P = 0.0003), low platelet count (OR, 0.99; P = 0.014), antiplatelet therapy (OR, 2.11; P = 0.036), and heparinization (OR, 4.50; P = 0.007). Risk factors for early death were low body mass index (BMI) (OR, 0.89; P = 0.015), low serum albumin levels (OR, 0.50; P = 0.035), and comorbidity of active cancer (OR, 4.03; P < 0.0001). There was no significant association between bleeding and early death after PEG. CONCLUSIONS: We identified several risk factors for bleeding and early death after PEG. Risk factors for bleeding were PEG tube insertion using the modified introducer method, low platelet count, antiplatelet therapy, and heparinization. Risk factors for early death were low BMI, low serum albumin levels, and comorbidity of active cancer.

Effects of a novel endoscopic reporting system with voice recognition on the endoscopic procedure time and report preparation time: propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: With the increase in endoscopic procedures, endoscopists are spending more time creating reports. Although medical reports have largely become electronic, most of the current reporting systems require manual operation. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a novel endoscopic reporting system that uses voice recognition (VR) technology. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy between September 2019 and March 2020 at a general hospital in Japan. The novel reporting system, used during endoscopic procedures, is equipped with VR and provides automatic responses by playing back recognized words. Differences in total time spent on the endoscopic procedure and report preparation between the manual entry (ME) and VR groups were evaluated using a propensity score matching method. RESULTS: We enrolled 356 patients: 226 and 130 patients in the ME and VR groups, respectively. Propensity score matching created 101 matched pairs. After matching, the median report preparation time (311 vs. 383 s, P = 0.009) and median total time (765 vs. 842 s, P = 0.053) in the VR group were shorter than those in the ME group. The VR system independently shortened the total and report preparation times by 156 s (95% confidence interval, - 274 to - 37 s; P = 0.009) and 118 s (95% confidence interval, - 220 to - 15 s; P = 0.023), respectively, on multiple linear regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The VR system could save the report preparation time and the total time. This novel system may improve the efficiency of endoscopy-related tasks.